Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Modified difficult index adding extremely difficult for fully impacted mandibular third molar extraction

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 45±Ç 6È£ p.309 ~ 315
±èÀ翵, ¿ëÇؼº, ¹Ú±¤È£, ÇãÁ¾±â,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÀ翵 ( Kim Jae-Young ) - Yonsei University College of Dentistry Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
¿ëÇؼº ( Yong Hae-Sung ) - Yonsei University College of Dentistry Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
¹Ú±¤È£ ( Park Kwang-Ho ) - Yonsei University College of Dentistry Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
ÇãÁ¾±â ( Huh Jong-Ki ) - Yonsei University College of Dentistry Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract


Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of the existing classification and difficulty index of impacted mandibular third molars in clinical situations and propose a more practical classification system.

Materials and Methods: This study included 204 impacted mandibular third molars in 154 patients; panoramic x-ray images were obtained before tooth extraction. Factors including age, sex, and pattern of impaction were investigated. All impacted third molars were classified and scored for spatial relationship (1-5 points), depth (1-4 points), and ramus relationship (1-3 points). All variables were measured twice by the same observer at a minimum interval of one month. Finally, the difficulty index was defined based on the total points scored as slightly difficult (3-4 points), moderately difficult (5-7 points), very difficult (8-10 points), and extremely difficult (11-12 points).

Results: The strength of agreement of the total points scored and difficulty index were 0.855 and 0.746, respectively. Most cases were classified as moderately difficult (73.0%). Although only 13 out of 204 cases (6.4%) were classified as extremely difficult, patients classified as extremely difficult were the oldest (P<0.05).

Conclusion: For difficulty classification, the authors propose one more difficult category beyond the existing three-step difficulty index: the clinician should consider the patient¡¯s age in the difficulty index evaluation.

Å°¿öµå

Third molar; Tooth extraction; Impacted tooth; Classification

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed